Gabriel Knight: The Beast Within
Apr. 28th, 2003 12:12 amI don't know if y'all have ever played Gabriel Knight, but in the second one, they had cool live-action stuff. And the actor they had as Gabriel was utterly gorgeous and had the most sensual accent imaginable. So why, in the third one did they go back to computer graphics for the people?
I so mourn the loss of the Gabriel. Man, that's one beautiful man. Dean Erickson, that's who it was. That man was lust incarnate - which was appropriate, because in the first one, that's what Gabriel is supposed to be, really. He's a sexy flirt.
And the guy who played the main villain (Friedrich Von Glower)... who was he? Ah, Peter Lucas. Also, very sexy. And he had a lot of sparkage with Gabriel. He wanted to be with Gabriel forever! As werewolf companions!
I so mourn the loss of the Gabriel. Man, that's one beautiful man. Dean Erickson, that's who it was. That man was lust incarnate - which was appropriate, because in the first one, that's what Gabriel is supposed to be, really. He's a sexy flirt.
And the guy who played the main villain (Friedrich Von Glower)... who was he? Ah, Peter Lucas. Also, very sexy. And he had a lot of sparkage with Gabriel. He wanted to be with Gabriel forever! As werewolf companions!
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-28 06:22 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-04-28 08:50 am (UTC)Maybe they couldn't bear the thought of doing a live-action GK without Friedrich. Yes, they thought that it would be too sad now that he was all dead and burnt up, so they switched to cgi to avoid thinking of that.
I'm choosing to believe that.