Doctor Who: Doomsday note
Jul. 11th, 2006 03:43 amOne more teeny, tiny note for Doomsday
The idea that Rose (or anyone) should structure their lives around another person's wishes drives me absolutely batty. If I'd lived my life the ideal way that my mom had wanted... I would be a great deal less happy than I am now. I'd likely have more of a college education, but less hard-earned wisdom.
The idea that Rose is a selfish brat because she didn't choose her mother and family over the Doctor... again, it drives me a little nuts. It's a worldview that is so completely opposed to my own. I love my mother. I adore her. But if I fell in love with someone, truly fell in love, and they wanted to move halfway across the world, I'd likely choose to be with the person that I was in love with rather than my family.
Or, if any of you have seen Fiddler on the Roof, the situation makes me think of the marriages in that. None of the daughters pick the men that their parents would have chosen for them. Are they selfish brats for that? Is Hodel selfish for leaving her family to join Perchik in Siberia? Is having a dream and following it really considered selfish?
I find it all very baffling.
The idea that Rose (or anyone) should structure their lives around another person's wishes drives me absolutely batty. If I'd lived my life the ideal way that my mom had wanted... I would be a great deal less happy than I am now. I'd likely have more of a college education, but less hard-earned wisdom.
The idea that Rose is a selfish brat because she didn't choose her mother and family over the Doctor... again, it drives me a little nuts. It's a worldview that is so completely opposed to my own. I love my mother. I adore her. But if I fell in love with someone, truly fell in love, and they wanted to move halfway across the world, I'd likely choose to be with the person that I was in love with rather than my family.
Or, if any of you have seen Fiddler on the Roof, the situation makes me think of the marriages in that. None of the daughters pick the men that their parents would have chosen for them. Are they selfish brats for that? Is Hodel selfish for leaving her family to join Perchik in Siberia? Is having a dream and following it really considered selfish?
I find it all very baffling.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 11:17 am (UTC)Yes, her mother is completely and totally wrong.
Your parents owe you stuff, not the other way round.
We don't ask to be born, do we?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 05:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:10 pm (UTC)The big difference between my mother and father and the way they treat me is that my dad has often acted as though I was an 'investment'. He put in time and money and it's my duty to pay him back in the way that he'd like, by getting the kind of job that he respects and living the kind of life that he'd prefer. And that's nonsense, it really is.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 12:02 pm (UTC)Thank you The notion that, because Rose didn't choose to leave the Doctor that she therefore hasn't grown at all, drives me completely insane. There are a bunch of people out there who somehow think that going home to Mum would be a sign of her maturity. I really don't get that at all.
But if I fell in love with someone, truly fell in love, and they wanted to move halfway across the world, I'd likely choose to be with the person that I was in love with rather than my family.
Yes. Prior to the world-separation thing, I was comparing it to Rose falling in love with someone who lives in Australia. At least living with the Doctor didn't require a very long and expensive trip across the world to see her Mum! All it requires is a, "Doctor, I want to see my Mum," and he's got her there in five minutes or less.
Is having a dream and following it really considered selfish? I find it all very baffling.
Bless. Yes, I know. The only thing I can think is that people are raised differently and therefore look at it differently. But it still strikes me as extremely odd.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:14 pm (UTC)They seem to be the same group (or overlap with the group) that thinks that Rose is a selfish, bratty child who isn't good enough to share breathing space with someone as magnificent as the Doctor. I don't think they want or expect maturity out of Rose, they just want the stupid girl to go home and play with her own toys instead of theirs.
That's kinda harsh of me. But I find myself more and more frustrated with this particular attitude.
Yes. Prior to the world-separation thing, I was comparing it to Rose falling in love with someone who lives in Australia. At least living with the Doctor didn't require a very long and expensive trip across the world to see her Mum! All it requires is a, "Doctor, I want to see my Mum," and he's got her there in five minutes or less.
Right -- he was completely willing to make sacrifices in his normal devil-may-care lifestyle for her. It went both ways.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 02:49 pm (UTC)Just playing devil's advocate here...
(no subject)
Date: 2006-07-11 10:19 pm (UTC)Rose loved him, yeah, but she also loved the lifestyle. She mentions it in The Unquiet Dead -- "You can go back and see days that are dead and gone... a hundred-thousand sunsets ago. No wonder you never stay still." She tells him how much she loves traveling with him in New Earth.
She wanted that life. She loved it.