Spirited debate is one thing. Accusing people of only buying into the surface of a show is something else.
How so? It's not valid to say I think you've avoided evidence that doesn't fit your theory? This is like saying I'm rude just because I think you're wrong.
You've pretty much talked down to me this entire discussion and I don't find patronizing attitudes conducive to healthy debates.
No, I've just expressed a dissenting opinion unapologetically in response to your original controversial post.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna
Re: and two...
Date: 2007-09-23 05:03 am (UTC)How so? It's not valid to say I think you've avoided evidence that doesn't fit your theory? This is like saying I'm rude just because I think you're wrong.
You've pretty much talked down to me this entire discussion and I don't find patronizing attitudes conducive to healthy debates.
No, I've just expressed a dissenting opinion unapologetically in response to your original controversial post.
This is me, walking away.