Yes, exactly. Whereas I actually think having a character like Chloe on the show is very freeing because her destiny is NOT a fixed point.
Indeed. They're able to do a whole lot with her, without being accountable to the people who own Clark Kent and Lois Lane (which is another reason that the Chlois theory rings false -- I can't imagine Almiles ever getting permission to do it, not from the people who sound as if they were guarding Lois's legacy so very carefully in her appearances on the show).
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna
(no subject)
Date: 2006-10-12 09:29 pm (UTC)Indeed. They're able to do a whole lot with her, without being accountable to the people who own Clark Kent and Lois Lane (which is another reason that the Chlois theory rings false -- I can't imagine Almiles ever getting permission to do it, not from the people who sound as if they were guarding Lois's legacy so very carefully in her appearances on the show).