(no subject)

Date: 2006-06-30 09:39 pm (UTC)
It's certainly not as if everyone else didn't know about TW. It was just Moffat, which is why it feels weird.

Off-hand Moffat's the only one writing something set before Victoria's reign. And it is quite possible/likely that RTD put some of the other ep's refs in himself.


By S1 romance, do you mean Rose? I can't think of anything else in the season that would really qualify, but am truly baffled at the idea that the Rose/Doctor thing wasn't sufficiently explained in the text. I can understand not liking it, but not thinking that they didn't explain their reasoning.

It starts throwing it in there when they've known each other for mere hours, with no effort to explain anything. What explainations do exist (mostly fanonically) don't jive with the positive way in which the relationship is otherwise presented. They're in love because they are. There's no effort at rhyme or reason, which at the very least Moffat attempted in tGitF, however convincing one finds it.


This one did not pull it off for me. It felt shallow and flat.

*shrug* Worked for me.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

butterfly: (Default)
butterfly

April 2019

S M T W T F S
 123456
78 910 111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios